By Liu Tzu-hsuan / Staff reporter
More than half of “US skepticism” narratives were created by Taiwan actors, while People’s Republic of China (PRC) actors had strong inclinations to spread such messages, the Information Operations Research Group (IORG) told a news conference yesterday.
The IORG, a civilian research organization working to bolster information literacy and counter authoritarianism, invited experts on cross-strait issues and US-Taiwan relations to share their insights on a report it published last month entitled US Skepticism Narratives and Where They Come From.
Growing ties between the US and Taiwan have fostered skepticism toward the US, which was manifested in “unreasonable or manipulative narratives that suggest that Taiwan should keep a distance from or reduce its relations with the US,” the report said.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
In the report, author and IORG codirector Yu Chih-hao (???) analyzed 84 US skepticism narratives over the past three years.
“Collectively, these 84 narratives present an escalation in the harmfulness of both US actions towards Taiwan and its end goal for Taiwan,” he said.
The narratives shifted from an exchange of benefits that ignored Taiwan’s interests in 2021, to a supposed US plan to destroy Taiwan altogether in these two years, he said.
Actors controlled by PRC authorities and media or affiliated organizations were found to be involved in amplifying 70 out of 84 narratives in the report, showing that these actors were more likely to spread US skepticism narratives rather than creating new ones, the report said.
Among the 84 narratives analyzed, 44 were created by Taiwanese actors, indicating “existing collective psychology in Taiwanese society” and explaining their continued circulation, it said.
For example, statements that accused the US of colluding with Taiwanese elites and exploiting Taiwanese reflect partisan polarization in Taiwan, while those that portrayed the US as “the source of chaos and war in the world” reflected war anxiety, it said.
As other PRC propaganda, these narratives shaped China as “a superior alternative” to the US, which is a worldview that might be appealing to some, who could in turn be vulnerable to information manipulation conducted by Beijing to sway elections, Yu said.
Huang Jaw-nian (???), an assistant professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies, said that authoritarian regimes tend to create a positive image of themselves by painting competitors negatively.
These regimes use conflicting opinions in democracies to their advantage, he said.
Taiwanese should equip themselves with sharpened media literacy and “literacy on global geopolitics” to form judgements on Taiwan’s relations with the US and China based on factual evidence, he said.
Jasmine Lee (???), coeditor of US Taiwan Watch, said that a history of severing diplomatic ties might be the reason Taiwanese are anxious about the nation’s relations with the US.
The two countries share the “double guarantees” of shared strategic goals and democratic values, she said.
Asked about the influence of US skepticism narratives on the presidential election in January next year, Albert Shihyi Chiu (???), an associate professor at Tunghai University’s Department of Political Science, said that China skepticism greatly outnumbers US skepticism, so it would be difficult for China-leaning stances to win votes.
To combat US skepticism narratives, it is crucial to have “diverse alternatives,” including responses from the US, Huang said.
Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.
